Main Menu McGoughLawP.C., L.L.O.
Contact Our Firm:
After Hours/Emergency:
  • Nebraska’s Go-To Sex Crimes Defense Firm
  • Nebraska’s Go-To Drug Crimes Defense Firm
  • Nebraska’s Go-To Criminal Defense Firm

Can everyday foods trigger an IID to fail?

People who have been arrested for suspected drunk driving in Nebraska will want to learn what types of penalties they may face if they are convicted in the end. One of the penalties can be the required installation and use in a vehicle of a special device that controls the vehicle’s ignition. This penalty may commonly be ordered in exchange for giving defendants the right to drive. Lack of using an ignition interlock device may result in a person being unable to drive for some period of time.

IIDs work by requiring a driver to take a breath test every time a trip in a vehicle is desired. If the test is passed, the ignition may be started. If the test is not passed, the ignition remains locked. Defendants may think that all they need to do is avoid drinking alcoholic beverages in order to successfully pass these tests but that is not true. The fact is that many everyday foods can cause an IID to register a level of alcohol that may prevent an ignition from being unlocked.

LifeSafer, a company that manufactures IIDs, indicates that eating a simple cookie may pose this problem. This is because vanilla extract is roughly one-third alcohol. Fruit, pizza, breads and other foods that can ferment may also cause problems for drivers. Drivers forced to use IIDs allow time after eating before using the devices.

This information is not intended to provide legal advice but general information to Nebraska residents about potential inaccuracies in ignition interlock devices after eating some types of foods.




No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • BBB Accredited Business
  • 10 Best 2016 Client Satisfaction American Institute Of Criminal Law Attorneys

Back To Top

Success Stories

  • Defendant was charged with sexual assault of a minor. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm got the alleged victim to confess that she made the whole thing up. Charges were dropped against our client.
  • Defendant was charged with possessing a large quantity of marijuana. Following a complete investigation by our firm, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
  • Defendant was charged with embezzling more than $300,000.00, from a previous employer. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm highlighted a number of inconsistencies and questionable statements. The State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
  • Defendant was charged with child abuse resulting in death. Following the investigation of our firm, depositions of key witnesses and presentation of our findings to the prosecutor, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client.
  • Defendant was charged with carrying a concealed weapon. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found our client Not Guilty.

What Our Clients Say About Us

  • “Jim, Thank you for all of your help over the past couple weeks. I cannot emphasize enough how much better I have felt after receiving your help. Keeping my record clean as possible means a lot to me and I couldn’t have done it without you, thank you!” -TP
  • “Jim, It's always a pleasure to see you in court. Your effective, professional representation of your clients is so helpful.” -LW
  • “Jim, On behalf of the V family, please allow me to offer a HUGE thank you for your exemplary legal representation - especially considering you took on this case a mere 5 months ago. ” -CV
  • “Thank you so much Jim for everything you have been doing on my case, you are greatly appreciated. I will contact you if anything else comes up//until then God bless you! ” -SH
  • “Jim, thank you for everything. After I was resentenced I became eligible for camp custody. I am now on the RDAP list and doing fine” -MH
  • “JThank you so much for writing back. I read your response and I want you to know I completely trust you” -KV