Nebraska Criminal & Trial Lawyers
Call Today 402.614.8655
After Hours/Emergency 402.660.6909

Criminal Defense Attorneys in Omaha

Preparing Your Case for Trial from Day One - Call (402) 614-8655

At McGoughLaw P.C. L.L.O., from the moment we meet with you, we work aggressively for a successful resolution in your case. We will take any and all steps to move your case to trial. The prosecution knows which attorneys go to trial and which do not. Our firm has a reputation for representing clients aggressively and achieving success at trial.

We do not assign you a single lawyer. Instead, you have a whole team working on your defense. Every member of your team knows what is happening with your case, so if you call to ask a question, you get an answer quickly instead of waiting for your attorney to call you back. Our team approach also lets us view your case from every angle, gaining important insight from every perspective.

To request a initial consultation with our criminal defense lawyers in Omaha, call (402) 614-8655.

Highly Skilled Trial Lawyers

The attorneys at our firm are in trial all the time. We have a firm grasp on how a case needs to be presented and we know how facts will be perceived by a jury. Our team sees preparation as the keystone to effective defense.

McGoughLaw P.C. L.L.O. accepts all criminal defense cases, including:

Can I Use Deadly Force to Protect Property in Nebraska?

In Nebraska, you are allowed to use deadly force in self-defense is justified if a reasonable ground existed under the circumstances for the defendant's belief that he or she was threatened with death or serious bodily harm, even if the defendant was actually mistaken about the extent of the danger. To prove that you had to use deadly force for self-defense, you must have a reasonable and good faith belief in the necessity of using force, and the force used in defense must be immediately necessary and justified under the circumstances. A defendant asserting self-defense as justification for the use of force must have a reasonable and good faith belief in the necessity of such force. In order for the self-defense justification to be applicable:

  1. Must be necessary and in good faith
  2. Deadly force had to be immediately necessary
  3. The force had to be justified under the situation.

Put Our Experience to Work for You

We review all the evidence in your trial and investigate every possible defense. If there is a piece of evidence that will aid in your defense, we will find it. Whether you have been accused of sexual assault or drunk driving, our Omaha criminal law lawyers will fight for your rights and your freedom. A majority of our clients have been falsely accused – we stand up for these clients and work tirelessly to protect them. We represent clients throughout Nebraska and in federal courts in Council Bluffs, Sioux City and Des Moines, Iowa.

Contact us online or call us at (402) 614-8655 to schedule a confidential consultation to discuss your case.

undefined undefined undefined

Client Success Stories

  • Assaults
    Defendant was charged with child abuse resulting in death. Following the investigation of our firm, depositions of key witnesses and presentation of our findings to the prosecutor, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client. Defendant was charged with assaulting an officer. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found our client not guilty. Defendant was charged with assault. Following our investigation and presentation of relevant information to the State, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client. Defendant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
  • Drug Possession
    Defendant was charged with possessing a large quantity of marijuana. Following a complete investigation by our firm, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client. Defendant was charged with carrying numerous pounds of marijuana. Following a suppression hearing where several statements made by the arresting officer were called into question, the State dismissed the felony possession charge. At sentencing, we presented evidence and information that convinced the Court to sentence our client to probation with no jail time. Defendant was charged with carrying numerous pounds of marijuana. Following a complete investigation by our firm, the State agreed to give the Defendant a deferred sentence which would not appear on his record. Our client avoided any criminal conviction and avoided a jail sentence. Defendant was charged with possessing drugs found at the airport. After our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client. Defendant was charged with possession of prescription drugs. Following a successful suppression hearing where the Court ruled that the State could not use certain evidence against our client, the State agreed to dismiss all felony charges against our client. At sentencing on a reduced misdemeanor charge, we were successful in convincing the Court to sentence our client to probation with no jail time. Defendant was charged with possession of prescription drugs while a student at college. After our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to refer the matter to diversion. This resulted in our client not having any criminal charges on his record. Defendant was charged with drug conspiracy and possession of a weapon. Following a hearing challenging the Government's evidence, the Court sustained our motion to suppress and ruled that the Government did not have probable cause to stop, detain or search our client.
  • Other Offenses
    Defendant was charged with possession of child pornography and was previously represented by a different attorney. Defendant came to us for help because his current attorney was not able to get the matter resolved from Defendant. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all felony charges against our client. Based upon our presentation to the Court at sentencing, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation without having to go to jail. Defendant was charged with carrying a concealed weapon. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found our client Not Guilty. Defendant was charged in federal court with impersonating an officer. Following an investigation and information presented to the Government, the Government agreed to dismiss the charges against our client. Defendant was charged with child endangerment and was previously represented by a different attorney. Defendant came to us for help because her current attorney was not able to get the matter resolved for Defendant. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client. Defendant was previously sentenced to several years in prison. Defendant had been represented by a different lawyer. Our firm was asked to review the case to determine if there was anything that could be done to reduce Defendant's sentence. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State and Court, our client was re-sentenced to time served and released from prison.
  • Sexual Offenses
    Defendant was charged with sexual assault of a minor. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm got the alleged victim to confess that she made the whole thing up. Charges were dropped against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. At the deposition of the alleged victim, a number of inconsistencies were identified and highlighted and the State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with soliciting a minor from craigslist. After taking a deposition of the alleged victim, our firm was able to highlight a number of inconsistencies and questionable information and the State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. During the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm got the alleged victim to admit that it was possible that all of the information provided to police was from a dream and was not real. The State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual abuse of a family member. Following a deposition of the alleged victim and complete investigation, demonstrating that a number of statements made by the alleged victim were questionable and inconsistent with other information, the State agreed to dismiss the charges. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found there was insufficient evidence to convict the Defendant. Our client was never convicted of the charge. Defendant was charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on family members. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found Defendant not guilty of two charges and found there was insufficient evidence to convict on a third charge. Before Defendant could be retried on the third offense, the State agreed to dismiss all sexual offenses against our client. Defendant was charged with a sexual assault that the State claimed happened several years ago when the Defendant was a minor. We filed a Motion to transfer the matter to juvenile court, arguing that the matter should be dismissed. After our hearing, the State agreed to dismiss charges against our client.
  • Theft
    Defendant was charged with embezzling more than $300,000.00, from a previous employer. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm highlighted a number of inconsistencies and questionable statements. The State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client. Defendant was charged with burglary. At the preliminary hearing, we created a record that established that the State had very little corroborated evidence against our client. After the hearing, we filed a motion to suppress, arguing that the charges should be dismissed because the State could not prove that our client was involved in the burglary. Shortly before a hearing on our motion, the State contacted us and agreed to dismiss all charges against our client. Defendant was charged in federal court with embezzling several thousand dollars. Following our investigation and providing relevant information to the Government and the Court, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation with no jail time. Defendant was charged in federal court with cheating the Government out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Following our investigation and settlement negotiations with the Government, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation without having to go to jail.

A Reputation Of Excellence

See What Our Clients Have To Say
  • “Thank you for all that you did - Nathan did a great job.”

    F.T.

  • “ Keeping my record clean as possible means a lot to me and I couldn't have done it without you, thank you!”

    T.P.

  • “Jim is the best lawyer I've seen and I was very pleased.”

    J.M.

  • “Jim, thank you for everything. ”

    M.H.

  • “Nathan, thank you so very much for getting this matter handled for me so quickly! ”

    S.M

  • “Nathan, thank you again for representing my case. I appreciate all the knowledge you provided and ensuring that I was in good hands.”

    A.K.

  • “Thank you for your constant help with this process.”

    N.L

  • “Thank you to everyone for working on my son's case.”

    R.M

  • “ I would without a doubt say his representation was above and beyond my expectations. ”

    D.B.

  • “I was very pleased with the outcome of my case and all the work the Jim and everyone did for me.”

    S.B.

  • “Thank you so much Jim for everything you have been doing on my case, you are greatly appreciated.”

    S.H.

  • “Thank you and everyone that's working on my case in your office!”

    S.H.

  • “Please allow me to offer a HUGE thank you for your exemplary legal representation.”

    C.V

  • “Thank you so much for all your hard work on my case which allowed me to be with my daughter and family for this holiday season.”

    M.L.

  • “Your office got involved at the right time and did a phenomenal job on cross-examination of the witnesses.”

    R.W.